RACISM - A PC-sponsored Global Industry !

The following is the unedited version of an exposé currently featured in the 20^th revised edition of Malleus Maleficus'  [title withheld]. If you wish to report intrusiveness, racism or inaccuracies, please email MalleusMaleficus@aol.com  To make a formal complaint under IPSO rules please contact IPSO directly at ipso.co.uk .  

  ...but nothing, so far as the past is concerned, could possibly be worse than the repressive, monomaniac lunacy of the left-liberal Commission for Racial Equality –  a politically righteous, divisive institution that – in its various recognized forms - has since become established in virtually all modern liberal democracies. Ostensibly conceived as a human rights foundation, with its air of  absolute integrity, it affects to be the sole and most powerful guardian of truth in the whole wide world. But how malicious and perverse that truth can be, when it is in fact all but  undermining the

very principle of civil liberty.  First established by the Race Relations Act of 1976, the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE), was in fact a non-departmental public body placed under parliamentary authority, whose mandate, meanwhile, has been merged into the new Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC). Which is, in truth, the only thing that distinguishes it from the Papal Inquisition, appointed in the thirteenth century under the Spanish crown, to proceed against converts, heretics and judaisers. For in reality, the EHRC is at once both, judge and counsel for the prosecution. No I'm not kidding. At some point in the early 1980s, the Commission for Racial Equality actually  maintained  that people of Chinese extraction should be referred to as “black”.
        But seriously, I have never seen a statutory body appointed under regulations passed by parliament, so obsessed with political correctness,  diversity, class and compliance – everything except live and let live. The whole idea of free speech is to ensure that opinions are given on the basis of choice, rather than wholly suppress within yourself any trace of the need to speak from the heart. Racial ‘harmony’, as a consequence is nothing but arbitrary terror – mainly involving shrill denunciations of ‘racist attitudes’.[1] All I see is hateful politicizing, baseless allegations and reputations being demolished for slips of the tongue. Which is just another chance for wallowing in self-pity or sniffing out insults where none exists - besides actively promoting and fostering a residual, tenacious  feeling of inferiority.           
      Self-indulgent, reactive, over-sensitive to the possibilities of unfair treatment, insular and invariably intransigent, it is the whingeing I find especially emetic. It is now a fully-blown politically correct activity on a level with the Paralympics. And here we come to the heart of the matter: accusations of racism subserve a profound existential necessity in the 

social ideology of the ethnic or immigrant West. They are, in fact, a kind of compensation for an obvious and humiliating sense of exclusion from a common cultural identity. More disturbingly, the mulishness of the wronged races, and of those still enslaved in their own cultural provenance, has become one of the unspoken taboos of the equality drive whose  adherents see themselves whenever possible as victims. Which leaves us with the Elephant in the room – a big part of the racist myth. And I don’t mean a biased social system, sharp racial and class divisions or the selective administration of justice – with both sides shooting to kill. I mean this uniquely acrimonious manifestation of victimhood and self-pity which owes its impetus chiefly to the neverending presence of racial auto-deprecation - which is to say,  to humans who get species envy and want to be another type. For in the last analysis, believe me, racism is this peculiar phenomenon in modern cultural history only for as long as its

victims insist on being treated as such. Or as Baroness Warsi, the daughter of Pakistani immigrants, purposefully reminded her PM, to him she was just  “a brown, working-class woman” who was “not good enough” to be a minister. And don’t we just love a mission statement.

           

---

[1] The Sunday Times 17.01.2016: Deputy Speaker [Eleanor Laing] accused of ‘unconscious bias, a racial bias’ – “Being ‘unconscious’,  this bias would legally have to be regarded as inadmissible speculation except by those who - due to an unfortunate unconscious  miscalculation -  have a priori concluded otherwise.” Judicial Watch.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

*** Malleus Maleficus is an advocate of English liberal democracy, and the  anonymous author of an historical apology of the British Empire.