“Fifty years is ample time in which to change a world and its people
almost beyond recognition. All that is required for the task are a sound
knowledge of social engineering, a clear sight of the intended goal – and
power. These things the Overlords possessed. Though their goal was hidden,
their knowledge was obvious – and so was their power.”
A.C. Clarke, Childhood’s End
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/530a3/530a3db4197e6e7cef7eed3c60080f0627b640fd" alt=""
platform. Combining internal profile material with external tracking in a system called Custom Audiences, it has the means to know exactly what you want – before you even want it, or why.
“The Nazi government sought and attained ‘perfect transparency’ into their citizens’ lives. That’s exactly how they knew who was a Jew, where the Jewish families lived, how they could get them and under which number they put them in the gas chamber,” says Google nemesis Mathias Dőpfner[2], who wants the internet giant cut down to size. And even though that doesn’t stop Google keeping precise archival records, we do not know where that data will go or what it will be used for. To wit, Europe’s attitude towards the American tech industry has altered considerably, since the European Court of Justice trashed a transatlantic data pact that invited Google and
other global monopolists to lodge personal info about European nationals with the US. Further penalties loom, including the power to fine companies up to 4% of their global turnover under the General Data Protection Regulation now going through European parliaments. Indeed, the journalist Matt Taibbi has already expressed himself on a similar point in his now famous description of Goldman Sachs as “a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money.”
Front
fanged and highly ravenous, Facebook is a textbook case, a perfect metaphor,
linking the basic laws of biology to electronic data, or what could
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b693/6b6936088e17d88d1da265bb93b080c0dcff8b1d" alt=""
integral part of that process. The idea that someone invisible is “telling you what to think and do” may seem preposterous, but far from it. From this point on, the invisible has entered into a visible kind of existence - or biochemical reaction in the brain - creating awareness and a sense of conscious compliance. So the addictive habit of conformity is being acquired. Which is the habit of forming addictions and dependencies on whosoever is controlling you remotely. In the prophetic language of John 1:14: “The Word became flesh and dwelt among us.”
The
next stage of the con is crucial – individually tailored to each user and
facilitated by associations made by the algorithms, we’re beholden to the binary code that directs
us! Nor is daily attendance essential
for cerebral mutations to take hold.
Both,
Facebook and Google are boosting serotonin levels in your brain. But as your
tolerance for ‘the drug’ increases and you start taking larger and larger
doses, you develop dependency. Indeed,
it is a biological fact that what is known as a bacteriophage will insinuate
its DNA into a microorganism and then multiply until it takes over. For once transmitted
to the network, this particular ‘virus’
will survive indefinitely, gradually killing its host. This process was
explained, earlier this year, in a paper
submitted to the American journal Epidemiology,[4] where researchers found not
only mental and psychic exhaustion, but mounting levels of depression stemming
from ‘engrams’ planted in your ‘reactive’ mind. It’s a classic case of
infectious growth. A kind of ‘superspreader,’
in other words, as in Steven Soderbergh’s 2011 medical thriller, Contagion,
that can spread between continents like a flu pandemic, polluting those whose
psychological immunity is already weakened, orwho are under some measure of psychological stress. A form of ‘social contagion,’ no less, well anticipated in The Host, a sci-fi drama in which a small group of humans try to avoid succumbing to ‘alien power sites’ that take over a host’s personality.
In fact, a virus can multiply only by
invading a host cell and taking over its biochemical functions, which is why
‘data-mining’ is an altogether inadequate expression to describe the designs
against an entire society. Exploiting what Sean Parker, the former president of
Facebook, called a “vulnerability in human psychology,” all the signs indicate
that Facebook reshapes the brains of humans in much the same way, with billions
of neurons culled and others building the new connections that turn individuals
into subjects. But the sorry thing about all this is that you would never know
it from the way brain cells can rewire and change patterns throughout
your lifetime as a result of your experiences and how you accommodate them. So
your memory affects the neurology of
your brain and the neurology impairs your judgment. Abandon the presumption of
innocence for anyone recovering from Facebook. You may continue to function as
an ordinary human being, but nothing you
can do or say will get it out of your system. It’ll enter you one way or
another. Either by invading certain cells in your
immune
system through those ubiquitous little “Like” buttons, or by directing engrams to move to your brain where they are
safe from antibodies and – while suggesting a cognitive ability to understand
what benefits them - even tell the critical faculties to shut
down.
Is there really more to
say? Bacteriophages may be the “most prevalent biological” entities on
the planet, but Google and Facebook, in one of the most contagious displays of
neural collaboration, are spreading across the globe like an invasive, parasitical infestation. Outpacing much
of the prevailing legal precedent on cloning technologies, what we are now
seeing in Europe, the United States and clearly also in the rest of the
world, is the slow, continuous evolution
of random point mutations in the genetic code that may epigenetically alter the human genome, as well as the nature of human perception.
[1] “Don’t worry about whether or not someone
has your date of birth, worry about whether someone is watching you while
you’re asleep.” Carl Leeming, convicted internet hacker.
No comments:
Post a Comment