The following is the
unedited version of an exposé originally featured in the 1996 edition of V.H.Ironside, The Willers of the Will - now out of print. What is of increasing
relevance to the arguments raised in this book is that Ratlike behaviour
blueprints are also applicable to human organizations, the stock market,
criminal patterns and the spread of ‘domestic’ violence.
“The broad effects which can be obtained by
punishment in man and beast are the increase of fear, the sharpening of the
sense of cunning, the mastery of the desires; so it is that punishment tames
man but does not make him ‘better’.” Nietzsche,
Genealogy of Morals
"I am in favour of war, hanging and Church Establishment!" Macaulay
What has indeed remained archaic about
it is that between constraining and being constrained it has caught men in the
grip of an invisible rage and entangled them in some decidedly psychotic
forces, unimpeded by any law. Forces which, like the grim ambivalence of lust
and cruelty, are themselves the peculiar increment of paradoxical
self-contradiction and which, almost like something alien, something not human,
makes men strive compulsively and determinedly towards paranoid and deadly
self-destruction. What is not really disputable, in support of the last,
scarcely exaggerated point is,
that if unacceptable demographic densities
are at the root of social tensions, almost certainly they are the sort of
tensions which are at the root of the peculiarly anti-social aggressiveness
which, in much the same way, has been found in laboratory experiments with different
species of animals. This point has been handled well by Desmond Morris, author
of The Naked Ape, who found that “aggressiveness can be increased by raising the density of a group of children. Under crowded
conditions the friendly social interactions between members of a group become
reduced, and the destructive and aggressive patterns show a marked rise in frequency
and intensity.” He also points out “this is significant when one remembers that
in other animals fighting is uses not only to sort out dominance disputes, but
also to increase the spacing-out of the members of the species.”[1]
Another clue, no less certain, is that
intense conflicts between group members is an inevitable social response among
communities of rats in confined circumstances of uncontrolled overbreeding. The
older ones destroy the younger, the stronger mutilate the weaker. Indeed, it passes
as a fact that rats will mutilate themselves. The motive behind this savagery
is no longer economic. Nor is the impulse predatory. The explanation seems to be
– and this may be taken as proof of our own abnormality – that they are no
longer capable of distinguishing between natural and unnatural instincts.
Interestingly, and no doubt quite consistently, if demographic imbalance helps
to account for the behavioural idiosyncrasies which, in this type of social
organization, are merely another example of absolute growth imposing drastic
measures of Malthusian redress, it is on this account by no means inappropriate
to the peculiar circumstances of some of our own overcrowded communities.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b397/6b39760ec1c001d6705401107cf51030f6914d69" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment